The movie is gorgeously cast, both exotic and menacing in
its foreign beauty, and startlingly suspenseful (especially considering that
anyone who’s seen 2001: A Space Odyssey, the Alien films, or any of the Star
Wars/ Star Trek films knows that anything—and I do mean anything—can pop up in outer space to
scare the stardust out of you). But this
isn’t a rave review, as the film isn’t without flaw—there are a half dozen too
many broadly-drawn characters, a disappointing waste of star power (the
woefully underutilized, and virtually unrecognizable, Guy Pearce killed me—and Charlize
Theron stalks about the Prometheus looking stunning but offering little more
than a sketch of the fallow human existence of a corporate drone), far too many
predictable events (who honestly couldn’t see the glaring inevitability that
the irascible hipster-geologist who irreverently modifies his multi-million
dollar spacesuit into a high-tech bong was going to be the first person
face-raped by the alien larva?) and maddeningly ludicrous, distracting details
(for example, somehow, despite the fact that future-us can construct a
trillion-dollar mission to the outer reaches of existence, we still wrap
ourselves in diaper-like undergarments that look like dirty Ace bandages. WHAT?
They can afford crystal chandeliers and a pool table with titanium balls
on this spacecraft but a stop at Victoria’s Secret was not in the budget?) HOWEVER, to be fair, in defense of the
casting, Michael Fassbender’s divinely silken android, David, was mesmerizing
(leaving me to puzzle, once again, what the hell is wrong with me that I am
always drawn to such emotionally unavailable men). As far as the action in the film, I must say,
the self-administered alien abortion in the pneumatic surgery pod was
horrifyingly original—and, of course, nauseatingly horrifying. And, in all fairness regarding the rehashed,
hackneyed, or cliché material in the film, who better to steal from Ridley
Scott’s bag of tricks with impunity other than the man himself? (As for borrowing the gauze-pad bandaged
underwear look from Luc Besson’s The Fifth Element, when you have
actresses as beguiling as Milla Jovovich or Noomi Rapace, I suppose I could
hardly blame them.)
Was the film good?
Absolutely—well worth the time, the money, and enduring a theatre full
of choleric teenagers pushing the limits of their curfews. Was it frightening? I’ll submit my bloody, shredded fingernails
as evidence to the affirmative. I
suppose the discordant note in my tone at the heart of this reaction/review stems
from the fact that I, in the audience, was left with a personal watershed experience
of brooding introspection about the philosophical implications of the
Prometheus journey that was, apparently, far deeper than any single character’s
on the screen. But for the two
scientists whose research incited the exploration, no character puzzles or
scrabbles with the weight of their mission’s objective—essentially—to corner
“God” and to ask him “Why?” While
I understand that most people come for the extra-terrestrial matter splatter,
you’d think a few more moments of a
2+ hour film could have been spared to allow the human characters more time to wrestle
with the poignancy of their purpose.
Man has struggled with his comprehension of the higher order of
things since long before myths of trees laden with the fruits of knowledge were
first woven—the hunger to know the mind of God is our tragic human flaw as well
as the inspiration for our greatest triumphs.
Mankind’s interminable need to understand the “who” and the “how” and
the “why” has been the driving force in the creation of our philosophies,
sciences, and arts—all things which define and delineate the exquisite nature
of the human creature and, coincidentally, make pseudo-gods of us all. And yet we still hunger for the “one” with
the answers to everything. As a human
who struggles daily with the weight of Epicurus’ assertion (“Is God willing to
prevent evil, but not able? Then he is
not omnipotent. Is he able, but not
willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”), I take this conundrum
very personally.
I suppose, in a way, good films (much like good books or
good music) show us what we need to see if we allow them to—as a child
without a father (not by fate or
circumstance, but by his choice alone), I have spent a lifetime examining
the relationships of parents and their children. Through a childhood without memories OF him, an adolescence without
experiences WITH him, and an
adulthood left ruminating ABOUT him,
I have invested a great portion of my life seeking some understanding of how
someone could bring something into this world and have no connection or
interest in its survival or accomplishment.
My life is approximately half over, and I have distilled my emotional
war to a single, overly-simplified parallel: our bodies create cancer, but we do not love it or cherish it or parent
it—we loathe it and seek to destroy and eradicate what we have created.
According to the film Prometheus, “God’s” answer to our earnest, child-like inquiries to the motivation of our creation is equally discouraging —just because something can MAKE us does not mean it WANTS us.
According to the film Prometheus, “God’s” answer to our earnest, child-like inquiries to the motivation of our creation is equally discouraging —just because something can MAKE us does not mean it WANTS us.
Wow. All this self-actualization
for the price of a movie ticket and a box of Junior Mints.
No comments:
Post a Comment